Am 15.04.2011 10:15, schrieb Paul Wise:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tobias Hansen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Here's what you said:
(08:04:51) pabs: BigMc: since alure is a library, I suggest that you read
libpkg-guide to get familiar with packaging libraries
(08:05:23) pabs: libpkg-guide does recommend libfoo1-dev instead of
libfoo-dev, which is against best practices
(08:07:36) pabs: BigMc: nothing in Debian depends on alure yet, so you won't
need to worry about any transition issues
libpkg-guide says both names are ok for Alure, but of course I believe you
when you say it's against best practices.
I guess I could have been more clear :)
To be clear, libalure-dev is the right name for most cases, you almost
never need a name like libalure1-dev.
Ah, now I see how you meant that 2nd sentence. I thought libfoo-dev is
against best practices, you meant "libfoo1-dev instead of libfoo-dev" is
against practices...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
