On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:02:43 +0900 d...@debian.org wrote: > lintian(1) says: > > | Adding overrides for pedantic tags is probably not worth the effort.
Oh, I have overlooked it. Thank you for your feedback. I'd been just convinced that "I should fix it" at that time. > BTW, I hesitate to upload this package because of pabs' suggetion. > We need to build consensus. Hmm, 1. hal-flash itself is evil, so not acceptable for debian 2. there is no problem hal-flash itself, but not acceptable for debian because it helps playback of DRM contents I guess that the concern is derived from 2., is it correct? If so, something like hal-compat software exists, (it also provides HAL compatibility layer which is similar to hal-flash, but it does not refer about flash DRM at all even though mainly used for it) - does it acceptable for debian or not? I don't know well. Should I stop ITP process at once?