On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:04:29PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 03:00:14PM +0200, Georges Mariano wrote: > > and ocaml-tools suggesting ledit ?? > > right. Wrong. Since the ocaml toplevel profits from it the package that contains the toplevel (whichever this will be) should Recommend (or rather Suggest ?) it. There is no reason that ocaml-tools should recommend it since none of the ocaml-tools profits from it. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Remi VANICAT
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Remi VANICAT
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- ledit and ile Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Georges Mariano
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Georges Mariano
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Georges Mariano
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Ian Zimmerman
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Ian Zimmerman

