On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > sorry, I read 'ocaml-tools' but I thought 'ocaml', sure. > I agree: ocaml should Suggest (and not Recommend IHMO) ledit, not > ocaml-tools. > > Not Recommend cause a user may install ocaml and, currently, don't use > the toplevel system but also the compiler, if we split ocamlc as a > standalone package the question is different. I agree that it should be Suggests. A user may use the toplevel very conveniently through an emacs interface, like tuareg (I don't know about the standard caml mode). -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Remi VANICAT
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Sven LUTHER
- ledit and ile Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Georges Mariano
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Ralf Treinen
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Georges Mariano
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Jean-Francois Monin
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Georges Mariano
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ... Ian Zimmerman
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Ian Zimmerman
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER
- Re: splitting the ocaml package ??? Sven LUTHER

