Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Seriously talking, an uniform naming convention is really usefull, so
> follow the existing one.
The question is "is it really existing ??"
(is it a "policy" question which needs to be "official" ?)
Very usefull indeed ("apt-cache search ocaml" !!!! ;-)
PS : there are currently a few packages with names like
[o]caml<name>
should we "suggest" to switch to
[o]caml-<name> and
[o]caml-lib<libname>
??
Cheers
--
# Georges MARIANO tel: (33) 03 20 43 84 06
# INRETS, 20 rue �lis�e Reclus fax: (33) 03 20 43 83 59
# 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
# FRANCE.
# http://www3.inrets.fr/estas/mariano
# http://www3.inrets.fr/B-Bibliography
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
