On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 01:16:06PM +0200, Georges Mariano wrote:
> should we "suggest" to switch to
> [o]caml-<name> and
> [o]caml-lib<libname>
> ??
what semantic do you want to associate to the two name ?
(i.e. when exactly you think have to be used one or other ?)
--
- Zack -
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ# 33538863
Home Page: http://www.students.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
Undergraduate Student of Computer Science at University of Bologna, Italy
SysAdm of verdicchio.students.cs.unibo.it (130.136.3.134)
"Information wants to be Open"
- ocamlodbc packaging Luc MAZARDO
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Ralf Treinen
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Ralf Treinen
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Luc MAZARDO
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
PGP signature
