On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 02:51:08PM +0200, Georges Mariano wrote: > Sven LUTHER wrote: > .. ocaml-web ... nice. No! ocamlweb is the upstream name, and hence is the name of the package. > > Anyway, i think we should conform to the ocaml-xxx naming scheme for new > > libraries and bindings, letting standalone programs keep their upstream name > Yes !! No !!! Can anyone give me good reason why we should name all ocaml packages in uniform way? This is just weird. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Stefano Zacchiroli
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Ralf Treinen
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Ralf Treinen
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Luc MAZARDO
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Georges Mariano
- Re: ocamlodbc packaging Sven LUTHER

