Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:29PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: >> >> Hi, > > Salut,
Hi Ralf, > >> Ocamlsdl needs ocamlopt and it seems that ocamlopt is not >> provided by all architectures (not suprisingly). >> >> So what is the best way to handle this? Should I specify >> all the architecture providing ocamlopt in the Architecture: >> field? > > Aren't these exactly the same architectures than those that have the > ocaml-native-compilers package? In this case a build-depends on > ocaml-native-compilers might do the trick, though it is not exactly > in the sense of policy. Well, I don't need native compilers to build the package, so build-depending on such a package may not help at all. Furthermore, I don't know how autobuilders behave when some dependencies are unmet: is the package not considered for the given architecture or is it considered as a failure? BTW, native compilers run on: ocaml-native-compilers | 3.04-13 | unstable | alpha, arm, i386, powerpc I've seen many more supported architectures in ocaml CVS (ia64, parisc), where have they gone ? Regards, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
