On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:14:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:29PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > Ocamlsdl needs ocamlopt and it seems that ocamlopt is not > > provided by all architectures (not suprisingly). > > So we can't have a bytecode versione of ocamlsdl, right?
Not exactly. The configure script requires ocamlopt currently and Makefile require both bytecode and opt compilers. I think this could be changed by upstream in the future. > > > So what is the best way to handle this? Should I specify > > all the architecture providing ocamlopt in the Architecture: > > field? > > Yes, this is the right choice. > IIRC Ralf's solution will inhibit ocamlsdl from entering testing due to > missing package build dependencies. Right. Thanks. Regards, -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
