On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:29PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > Ocamlsdl needs ocamlopt and it seems that ocamlopt is not > provided by all architectures (not suprisingly).
So we can't have a bytecode versione of ocamlsdl, right? > So what is the best way to handle this? Should I specify > all the architecture providing ocamlopt in the Architecture: > field? Yes, this is the right choice. IIRC Ralf's solution will inhibit ocamlsdl from entering testing due to missing package build dependencies. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
pgpK6BDghZcKE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
