> > Hum, yes, but not for all. For example, cameleon native and bytecode > > versions differ because the bytecode version allows the plug-in loading, > > but native version is faster. For tools where native and byte code versions > > do the same, I agree that I should only compile byt OR native. I'll do this > > in the future. > > But keeping bytecode AND native is good, isn't it ? > > If there aren't any good reason for keeping both, users won't understand. > Are cameleon binaries the only ones to behave differently in Cameleon? > (BTW, what binaries from the cameleon directory behave a different way?)
Excuse me, i forgot a part of the sentence : But keeping bytecode AND native *FOR LIBRARIES* is good, isn't it ? -- Maxence
