On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:44:49PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:28:29PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:32:47PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > This leaves more flexibility to the user, and would allow to do a > > > binary:all package build even on a native code supporting arch. > > > > Which is only true for libraries. It isn't for binaries since > > standalone byteocde programs embed the bytecode interpreter > > which is architecture dependent. > > ??? > > I don't understand you. > > The idea is to build one package arch: all which you build with the > bytecode compiler (and without the -custom flag). The resulting > executables will be /usr/bin/ocamlrun script, as can be seen with the > ledit package for example : > > $ file /usr/bin/ledit > /usr/bin/ledit: a /usr/bin/ocamlrun script text executable
Is it standalone or does it need to have ocaml installed (providing /usr/bin/ocamlrun)? -- Jérôme Marant
