On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:22:59PM +0200, Maxence Guesdon wrote: > > > > Hum, yes, but not for all. For example, cameleon native and bytecode > > > versions differ because the bytecode version allows the plug-in loading, > > > but native version is faster. For tools where native and byte code > > > versions do the same, I agree that I should only compile byt OR native. > > > I'll do this in the future. > > > But keeping bytecode AND native is good, isn't it ? > > > > If there aren't any good reason for keeping both, users won't understand. > > Are cameleon binaries the only ones to behave differently in Cameleon? > > (BTW, what binaries from the cameleon directory behave a different way?) > > Excuse me, i forgot a part of the sentence : > But keeping bytecode AND native *FOR LIBRARIES* is good, isn't it ? >
This is _way_ different :) I strongly agree with you about libraries. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant
