On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 03:36:29PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > En réponse à Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > BTW, I'd advice that you provide the emacs mode separately, in > > > a package called "ocaml-mode". > > > > Ok, i can do that, but i don't really like it a lot. It is part of the > > ocaml source package, and any trouble i would have with the emacs mode > > would mean a new upload to ocaml also. > > But even when there is a problem with this mode shipped _inside_ ocaml > would mean a new ocaml upload anyway.
Yes, exactly what i was saying, if it requires a new upload anyway, there is no gain in complicating things and shipping the ocaml mode in an extra package. > > Another solution would be to not ship the emacs mode from the ocaml > > package and create a new source package containing the emacs mode, or > > maybe even add it to the existing package which contains the > > alternative > > emacs mode, maintained by Ralf, if i am not wrong. > > > > Ralf, what do you think about this ? > > I think it would be a good idea. And even a better idea for you since > you are not an Emacs user. :))) Altough i suppose that uploading a new ocaml with a patch applied doesn't cost much anyway. > Are there any Ocaml users using this ocaml mode rather than the > Tuareg mode ? I think this mailing list is to restricted a forum to answer this question. The ocaml mode is the standard shipped by upstream, so i suppose the ocaml team at least use it. Friendly, Sven Luther
