On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:51:12PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:35:16PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:24:46PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:02:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 08:57:05PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 02:26:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 01:44:42PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, I'd advice that you provide the emacs mode separately, in > > > > > > > a package called "ocaml-mode". > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, i can do that, but i don't really like it a lot. It is part of > > > > > > the > > > > > > ocaml source package, and any trouble i would have with the emacs > > > > > > mode > > > > > > would mean a new upload to ocaml also. > > > > > > > > > > Splitting off a new binary package (with architecture=all) is > > > > > easy. The emacs files of the ocaml package currently take > > > > > 164 kB for the el (emacs-lisp sourec) files, plus 100 - 124 kB > > > > > per flavour. Hence, if you have three flavours of emacs installed > > > > > > > > Err, the 100-124 per flavor are the ones that get compiled at install > > > > time, aren't they. > > > > > > That's correct. It doesn't concern package size, but it is still a > > > waste of space on the users machine if he doesn't want this emacs > > > mode. > > > > He don't need to install emacs in that case, does he ? > > Maybe he wants to use emacs for other things besides editing ocaml file > using the original ocaml emacs mode ?
Sure, sure, but then, he don't really worries about 300Ko or so, not with the size of the emacs packages already installed. But sure i agree with you, i will split off the ocaml mode with my next package upload. Friendly, Sven Luther
