Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I don't know if you are aware of that, but a discussion has been raging > on debian-vote about the removal of non-free from our archive, our BTS, > and so on. > > I have been involved in it (even proposed a GR ammendment, altough it > was a bit 'bancal'), and also since i am involved with non-free as DD (i > maintain the unicorn ADSL modem drivers) and as user (i need lha, but > also also because of ocaml-doc and ocaml-books). > > Since the debian-ocaml team is involved with 3 packages in non-free, i > would like to hear about your/our position on this issue (well, and > eventually second the anti-non-free removal if you feel like this).
[...] > So, what is our position on this, both individually and as a group ? Well, individually, as the maintainer of ocaml-doc, but also as an user of debian, I really don't see any advantage for debian to remove non-free, and I see several advantage for debian to have it, so I'm completely against such a proposition. -- Rémi Vanicat
