Quoting Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The apt system is structured in such a way that you can use any > > repository you want. Splitting non-free out of debian will simply imply > > that debian machines wont host non-free packages anymore. We will > > probably see the creation of something like non-free-debian.org which > > will ship all those packages. All the users willing to use non-free > > packages will just have to add the relevant lines in their sources.list. > > And what about the BTS, and other developer infrastructures ?
Can be installed on third party machines as well. > And in particular, does that mean that we will drop ocaml-doc, > ocaml-books-en and ocaml-books-fr ? Not really a problem. Again, it is a matter of moving every non-free stuff out of debian.org resources. It doesn't mean we can't setup something satisfactory elsewhere. > > It's just a matter of standardizing a well-known repository of non-free > > packages and move it out of debian. Really. > > Yeah, except the burden will be on the developers of non-free stuff, > which have more interesting things to do with their time. We don't care for them. -- Jérôme Marant
