On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:32:16AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > Hello, > > Well, it is quite heavy as discussion. I think non-free is needed for a > lot of us ( as user and as DD ). In fact, since i have seen this > discussion about GFDL and documentation in general, i can't stop > thinking that is really a loose of time. > > I can't understand the position about removing non-free. I was thinking > that it was in social contract. Removing non-free is non sense. I have
Well, this include ammending the social contract. It needs 3:1 majority, and i doubt it will pass, but i guess most people don't read debian-vote. > Concerning the .el... As usual, we have the opinion of a "100% free" > supporter ( ie RMS ). I don't think it is a good position neither. To my Except for documentation :)) > mind freedom, is also the choice of upstream to choose their licence... > ( you know : "free speech / free beer" ) I doubt it will happen. Friendly, Sven Luther
