On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 03:21:49PM -0400, Mike Furr wrote: > On Fri, 2004-06-11 at 14:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > liblabltk-ocaml labltk stublibs > > liblabltk-ocaml-dev liblabltk-ocaml labltk header > I wouldn't mind those, except it might not be clear if this was a > different Tk lib than that distributed with ocaml. > > > libbase-extra-ocaml extra stublibs > > libbase-extra-ocaml-dev libbase-extra-ocaml extra header > I think this name makes no sense. having 'base' and 'extra' together > is confusing. > > > libgraphics-ocaml graphics stublibs > > libgraphics-ocaml-dev graphics header > Since these would contain only ~5 files each, this seems a little excessive. > The graphics stuff should be combined with the labltk. > > Well, I'm just about done with the patch using the names as before. It > isn't too much of a pain to change the them, but it will be annoying. I > don't see the need to change. > --
Hello, Well, what about : libcompilers-extra-ocaml in place of libbase-extra-ocaml. For the split graphics/labltk, we could include graphics in liblabltk-ocaml, but we need to state this in short/long description... If you could include it in your patch, i will be very thankfull to you. Kind regard Sylvain Le Gall
