On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:54:08PM -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
> If we change away from the foo / foo.opt naming scheme, I'd prefer to
> make a "clean break" and adopt the .bytecode/.native approach. I
> always thought the presence of both ocamlopt and ocamlc.opt was quite
> confusing (and leads to abominations like ocamlopt.opt). I'd rather
> see ocamlc{,.native,.bytecode} and ocamlopt{,.native,.bytecode}, etc.
>
> I suppose *.opt symlinks could be kept for a while for compatibility,
> but I'd rather see them go away.Fully agreed, but we can't do such a change "just" in Debian. We need to convince upstream about that and I don't think it would be easy... -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what? [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
