On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 11:02 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:35:35AM +1000, skaller wrote: > > On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:08 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > > > So if someone step forward and > > > is willing to implement the alternative mechanism which can make > > > ocamlopt (and friends) point to either ocamlopt.byte or ocamlopt.native > > > then please go ahead. I have no objection in shipping that stuff as > > > Debian's ocaml 3.10.0. > > > > You can't do that, it will break things. In Felix at the moment, > > ocamlopt.opt crashes handling dypgen, or, dygen crashes. > > ocamlopt crashes with a Stack overflow message sometimes. > > > > It's quite possible ocamlopt.opt will fail where ocamlopt > > will actually work. > > So ? You simply make a call to ocamlopt.byte instead of ocamlopt then, > no ?
No, because only Debian uses those names... what you say would be fine if Inria also followed the same convention. Fact is .. I don't use any Debian Ocaml packages.. the two things I religiously don't install with Debian are Ocaml and Felix (my package). I build Ocaml myself, usually any beta/dev version floating around in CVS. -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
