----- Forwarded message from Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:02:40 +0200
From: Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [email protected]
Subject: Re: "weird" naming convention for ocamlbuild executables

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:35:35AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 22:08 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> 
> >  So if someone step forward and
> > is willing to implement the alternative mechanism which can make
> > ocamlopt (and friends) point to either ocamlopt.byte or ocamlopt.native
> > then please go ahead.  I have no objection in shipping that stuff as
> > Debian's ocaml 3.10.0.
> 
> You can't do that, it will break things. In Felix at the moment,
> ocamlopt.opt crashes handling dypgen, or, dygen crashes.
> ocamlopt crashes with a Stack overflow message sometimes.
> 
> It's quite possible ocamlopt.opt will fail where ocamlopt
> will actually work.

So ? You simply make a call to ocamlopt.byte instead of ocamlopt then,
no ? 

Should be a single line change if your build system is well done.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
[EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to