On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:28:04PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > Hello calmers ;-), > > What we are supposed to do with FTBFS like #483280, #483307, and similar > where > ocamlopt binary is just not available on these particular architectures, in > that case IA-64 ? Should we just set the severity to important as Luk Claes > did for #483280 and wait for upstream to provide support for IA-64 or should > we remove ia64 from Architecture: list ? > > By the way, I'd like to thank Stefano and Sylvain for improving the (my;-) > ara > package and *documenting* that in README.Debian-source! I'm already a DD, so > I can upload myself, but I'd love to co-maint/co-develop it together.
Just jumping in, but these packages are RC-buggy, and the policy says what to do with them, no ? I think the correct severity is grave, fails to follow policy. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
