On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 04:38:06PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 03:43:56PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > The problem is either : > > Sven, are you reading posts before posting?
I did read the posts, but i admit i did not check the bug reports for the other mail where i claimed this to be RC. > I've already stated in this thread that "ia64" is *NOT* in the Arch > field of neither spamoracle, nor ara. And it has been explained by > others why the buildds are trying to build the packages. Yes, but the question of the parent post, seemed to show that this was not clear enough, so i tried to be complete and didactic as possible. I also was not entirely sure, so i showed both possibilities, clearly saying that i thought it was probably the second case. But you are right, i am quite busy right now, and well since the sad events we all know, my time and involvement in debian is almost nil, so i try to be helpful when i can, but may miss some of the more verbose and not clearly said points in various mails, or may have missed recent developments. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
