Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:11:32 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >> So, even assuming that the buildd have been invoked on the two packages >> for some weird buildd reason, I don't get why binary-arch was invoked. > > Because that's what dpkg-buildpackage -B does, and what buildds use. > >> But even admitting this is due to some buildd weirdness, I'm not getting >> why the bugs have been reported. Aren't they bogus? >> > They are.
Well, not really. As long as a package is not in P-a-s on that architecture it's still a bug either because it has to be added to P-a-s or because it should build on that architecture (eventually after adding support). >> Luk, why you did raise the severity? >> > He downgraded it from serious to important, AIUI. Indeed, I downgraded them as the package is not in testing on these architectures. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
