Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You do this, then it is no longer a standard, it is the > documentation of a particular program.
So? We're talking about treatement of the document, not treatment of the specifically named standard. Otherwise it would be sufficient to call it something else when dealing with a work derived from the document. > Raul> Anyways, what I'm proposing is that such works should go into > Raul> a new section -- one which could be put on cdrom, but whose labeling > Raul> indicates that they don't meet the same guidelines as main. I'm > Raul> not sure what to best call it -- perhaps "verbatim". > > Yes. Things i main are those that meet the DFSG. Things in > verbatim don't, but they still have to meet the requirements of DFDG > (no discrimination, freely dostributable, etc, etc) Good enough. -- Raul
