Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You do this, then it is no longer a standard, it is the
>> documentation of a particular program.
Raul> So? We're talking about treatement of the document, not
Raul> treatment of the specifically named standard. Otherwise it
Raul> would be sufficient to call it something else when dealing with
Raul> a work derived from the document.
I think you hacve lost sight of what we are talking about. I am
saying that if the standard does give distribution rights under an
immutability clause, the community suffers no harm from distributing
the document.
I suspect this discussion was a red herring ;-)
However, we seem to concur about the non main verbatim
section, and possibly about the need for a DFDG for that section, so
I'll not carry this discussion further.
manoj
--
"I can handle reality in small doses, but as a lifestyle it's much
too confining." Lilly Tomlin
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
