On Sun, 30 May 1999 at 14:05, Marcus Brinkmann wrote about "Re: Making sure...":
> > How many seconds should this require? 1 or 2? > > 2 IMHO. Manojs argument was that if a proposal doesn't even get the > attention of two developers, what may it be worth? I think two is an absolute minimum. It shouldn't be too high because as we've noted recently that even the successful proposals didn't receive more than about 5. I think we should go for three. If people know that three seconders are needed, then they'll be more inclined to second. Another important question: what about those who object to the proposal? Should they be formally recorded? And what happens with that? Should we require X number more seconders than objectors? (X should be the number above..and again, if it's 5-4 that something should pass as a change in policy, is that enough?) BR > > > Should we keep the rejected proposals around in the BTS in > > > state fixed, so that one does not have to redo the old arguments over > > > again? There's nothing wrong with this, provided it doesn't happen 2 weeks later. 3 months later should be fine (maybe sooner, maybe later; but you understand the idea) -- Brock Rozen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director of Technical Services (410) 602-1350 Project Genesis http://www.torah.org/
