Brock Rozen wrote: > Another important question: what about those who object to the proposal? > Should they be formally recorded? And what happens with that? Should we > require X number more seconders than objectors? (X should be the number > above..and again, if it's 5-4 that something should pass as a change in > policy, is that enough?)
You're missing part of the point of Manoj's process. It's designed to be very lightweight, low on formal stuff. If people object we obviously lack a consensus, so the proposal doesn't get in. -- see shy jo
