On Sun, 30 May 1999 at 13:25, Joey Hess wrote about "Re: Making sure that...":
> > Another important question: what about those who object to the proposal? > > Should they be formally recorded? And what happens with that? Should we > > require X number more seconders than objectors? (X should be the number > > above..and again, if it's 5-4 that something should pass as a change in > > policy, is that enough?) > > You're missing part of the point of Manoj's process. It's designed to be > very lightweight, low on formal stuff. If people object we obviously lack a > consensus, so the proposal doesn't get in. Well, I definitely think we should start with something lightweight -- but the whole process of accepting proposals/amendments should eventually become formalized, with specific rules on how it's done -- IMHO. Starting with what Manoj has proposed is great -- we can build from there. -- Brock Rozen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director of Technical Services (410) 602-1350 Project Genesis http://www.torah.org/
