Hello Manoj Srivastava schrieb: > >>"Arthur" == Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Arthur> Some HURD developer assured me that the hurd will have linux > compatible > Arthur> kernel logging. > > Could we have more details, please?
# Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:37:48 +0200 # From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # To: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Cc: [email protected] # Subject: Re: [Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd] # Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] # on Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:23:49PM +0200 # # On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:23:49PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote: # > I think it would be even better to split up sysklogd into two # > packages, and then have virtual packages like # > 'system-log-daemen' and 'linux-kernel-log-daemon' (or would # > 'kernel-log-daemon' be sufficient? Im thinking on the HURD). # # Thanks for paying attention. The Hurd can and will have a # kernel logger, # too, so please use the generic name. # # Thanks, # Marcus I don't know the HURD, Marcus, how far are you HURD ppl with kernel logging? > Is this a definite course of action? Is someone working on > the code? Shall there be a hurd specific logging mechanism? > (in which case we should not get rid of the linux part). In > any case, I would rather wait until one is sure that such a > beast actually exists before changing stuff. Nobody uses these virtual packages yet, I wasn't even aware that they were already official, changing them shouldn't be a problem. I think it will be much more work to change it later, when these packages are used. (And they _will_ be used, as soon as I get in touch with Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or do that NMU ...). ciao, 2ri -- Der beste Beweis für die Existenz ausserirdischer _Intelligenz_ ist der, dass noch niemand versucht hat, Kontakt mit uns aufzunehmen. -- Bill Watterson
