Your message dated Wed, 4 Oct 2000 22:26:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#66535: s/linux-kernel-log-daemon/kernel-log-daemon/g
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2000 15:12:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 30 10:12:16 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.datacomm.ch [212.40.5.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 1382Sl-0001Zz-00; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 10:12:16 -0500
Received: from turing.prv.korn.ch (line108.datacomm.ch [212.254.0.157])
by smtp.datacomm.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA26068
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:12:10 +0200
Received: from arthur by turing.prv.korn.ch with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 1382SX-0000kp-00; Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:12:01 +0200
From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: proposal of virtual package: syslogd
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 17:12:01 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to have all unix logging subsystems provide syslogd, so
users are free to choose one that fits them. (I'm packaging msyslog
(http://www.core-sdi.com/) and see that this would be already the third
non-obsolete logging-daemon in debian).
There should probably also be guidlines on syslog-facility and the
rotating and logging behavior of packages providing syslogd, in order
for other packages to know what they can assume.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux turing 2.2.16 #1 Mon Jun 12 12:09:23 CEST 2000 i586
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 66535-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2000 20:27:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 04 15:27:19 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from line128.datacomm.ch (turing.prv.korn.ch) [::ffff:212.254.0.177]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13gv8I-0005zh-00; Wed, 04 Oct 2000 15:27:19 -0500
Received: from arthur by turing.prv.korn.ch with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13gv74-0003Wa-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 04 Oct 2000 22:26:02 +0200
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 22:26:02 +0200
From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#66535: s/linux-kernel-log-daemon/kernel-log-daemon/g
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
X-Face: #IT=!jt##jq+,H7?/t"2s)h(o<l`oz:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&-?|i,x19;yM-<f<v,SFF4!BZ5N]ii
b+:lZKb)d,Oew0#uM|c7`NW,DG#YlT2"t/5^~ap-TRV%6_Cje2Qq1\H12R\UB3VjMf&*,g></oLaV~
Pg{t9mLT_Rb="h9"u=>2dFk=\NtVMNjU}z'}{2%b_SpKKn27hSKK(8G[>S`#RQ[{^aSG~07LW|!9bi
yM'=([4R*$E*';L
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its OK how it is now. Nothing needs to be changed.
----- Forwarded message from Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 18:34:56 +0200
From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Status von kernel logging im HURD? [Bug#66535:
s/linux-kernel-log-daemon/kernel-log-daemon/g]
User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.4i
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 04:46:58PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> ----- Forwarded message from Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
>
> Subject: Bug#66535: s/linux-kernel-log-daemon/kernel-log-daemon/g
> Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:51:31 +0200
> From: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
>
> Hello
>
> Manoj Srivastava schrieb:
> > >>"Arthur" == Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Arthur> Some HURD developer assured me that the hurd will have linux
> > compatible
> > Arthur> kernel logging.
> >
> > Could we have more details, please?
>
> # Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:37:48 +0200
> # From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # To: Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # Cc: [email protected]
> # Subject: Re: [Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd]
> # Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> # In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # on Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:23:49PM +0200
> #
> # On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:23:49PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> # > I think it would be even better to split up sysklogd into two
> # > packages, and then have virtual packages like
> # > 'system-log-daemen' and 'linux-kernel-log-daemon' (or would
> # > 'kernel-log-daemon' be sufficient? Im thinking on the HURD).
> #
> # Thanks for paying attention. The Hurd can and will have a
> # kernel logger,
> # too, so please use the generic name.
> #
> # Thanks,
> # Marcus
>
> I don't know the HURD, Marcus, how far are you HURD ppl with
> kernel logging?
We have a /dev/klog, which wil be read by syslogd directly. Despite what I
said, the Hurd will not have a seperate kernel logger. We use syslogd in
GNU inetutils.
So, you can talk about linux-kernel-log-daemon, if you mean a specific linux
kernel logger which can make use of the System map files.
I am not up to date to the linux side of the discussion, but the Hurd side
is very easy: we only have a system logger daemon, which also does kernel
logging. :)
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
