Your message dated Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:01:11 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#83069: fixed in debian-policy 3.5.2.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2001 20:44:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 21 14:44:04 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cc551902-b.indnpls1.in.home.com (apocalypse.deadbeast.net)
[::ffff:24.183.211.35]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14KRLH-0002A3-00; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 14:44:03 -0600
Received: by apocalypse.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B94BE67008; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:44:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:44:02 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSED] bringing X app-defaults policy into the era of XFree86 4
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.2.1.2
Severity: wishlist
This policy revision is long overdue, since the transition away from the
current policy is actually largely complete already.
This is probably the most important X policy proposal in quite a while,
since we have lintian checks that enforce the old obsolete policy.
--- policy.sgml.orig Sun Jan 21 14:48:38 2001
+++ policy.sgml Sun Jan 21 15:41:14 2001
@@ -6101,29 +6101,22 @@
=09
<p>
<em>Application defaults</em> files must be installed in the
- directory <tt>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/</tt>.
- <footnote>
- <p>Note: This shall change very shortly.</p>
- </footnote>
- They should not be registered as <em>conffile</em>s or
- otherwise treated as configuration files. Customization of
- programs' X resources may be supported with the provision of
- a file with the same name as that of the package placed in
- the <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt> directory, which must
- registered as a <em>conffile</em>. <em>Important:</em>
- packages that install files into the
- <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt> directory <em>must</em>
- declare a conflict with <tt>xbase (<<
- 3.3.2.3a-2)</tt>; if this is not done it is possible for the
- installing package to destroy a previously-existing
- <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources</tt> <em>file</em> which had been
- customized by the system administrator.
- <footnote>
- <p>Rationale: clarifies the language to properly
- address the package maintainer, not the system
- administrator, as to how to manage
- /etc/X11/Xresources.</p>
- </footnote>
+ directory <tt>/etc/X11/app-defaults/</tt> (use of a localized
+ subdirectory of <tt>/etc/X11/</tt> as described in the <emph>X
+ Toolkit Intrinsics - C Language Interface</emph> manual is also
+ permitted). They must be registered as <em>conffile</em>s or
+ handled as configuration files. For programs that are not linked
+ against the X Toolkit (Xt) library, customization of programs' X
+ resources may also be supported with the provision of a file with
+ the same name as that of the package placed in the
+ <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt> directory, which must registered as
+ a <em>conffile</em> or handled as a configuration file.
+ <em>Important:</em> packages that install files into the
+ <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt> directory <em>must</em> declare a
+ conflict with <tt>xbase (<< 3.3.2.3a-2)</tt>; if this is
+ not done it is possible for the installing package to destroy a
+ previously-existing <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources</tt> file which had
+ been customized by the system administrator.
</p>
=20
=09
--=20
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | If ignorance is bliss,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | is omniscience hell?
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
--MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjprShIACgkQ6kxmHytGonygLACdEA9hrxkLVaB31EodmarqG8jd
+YoAoJ3Igsn3SxrBE2Ss9iJbl38aHJhk
=2VqJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--MZf7D3rAEoQgPanC--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 83069-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Feb 2001 17:04:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 19 11:04:57 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [::ffff:206.246.226.45]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Utk7-0001M9-00; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 11:04:55 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14UtgV-0001KA-00; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:01:11 -0500
From: Debian Policy List <[email protected]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#83069: fixed in debian-policy 3.5.2.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 12:01:11 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
debian-policy, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:
virtual-package-names-list.text byhand
mime-policy.text.gz byhand
libc6-migration.text byhand
debconf_specification.txt.gz byhand
menu-policy.text.gz byhand
debian-policy_3.5.2.0.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.2.0.dsc
debian-policy_3.5.2.0.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.2.0.tar.gz
policy.pdf.gz byhand
policy.text.gz byhand
policy.html.tar.gz byhand
policy.ps.gz byhand
debian-policy_3.5.2.0_all.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-policy/debian-policy_3.5.2.0_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Debian Policy List <[email protected]> (supplier of updated
debian-policy package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:11:49 +0000
Source: debian-policy
Binary: debian-policy
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.5.2.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Policy List <[email protected]>
Changed-By: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
debian-policy - Debian Policy Manual and related documents
Closes: 83069
Changes:
debian-policy (3.5.2.0) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Add XFree86 app-defaults ammendment closes: Bug#83069
Files:
51bac9f9b1139bf768faf326a1606d4c 980 doc optional debian-policy_3.5.2.0.dsc
10c43ee53da65c5f272469a9a87e4489 524795 doc optional
debian-policy_3.5.2.0.tar.gz
b28375ceb6a83a4c25474910b72e019c 543820 doc optional
debian-policy_3.5.2.0_all.deb
72ec0b229b5c13aa8a9b05cfee068016 62765 byhand - policy.text.gz
3ed7aa5a489834b24bb28ff377a34aa9 10982 byhand - libc6-migration.text
b9ffc0d13d1467967d994288c4adc29b 7686 byhand - virtual-package-names-list.text
fdf1d1b1ec8a37d0402e07ac563f2644 2185 byhand - menu-policy.text.gz
db23471156b8c79608ec805cf962be6e 1603 byhand - mime-policy.text.gz
b4f35e7de25b66322d4d6a30aac5f0a9 112954 byhand - policy.ps.gz
afe8d86ef094748ee1e90127e8f3f9aa 209162 byhand - policy.pdf.gz
c9310ecde6444a8e3e58cdd511dcd0bf 67424 byhand - policy.html.tar.gz
87506139e773306a2c2159c1ec3214d4 6112 byhand - debconf_specification.txt.gz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQEVAwUBOo/iupSNOLPkECCJAQH1OAgAmWW+dDze86Jn82ftEOz+fmqyOsMOhAKP
5QyFHSIpRx1mU9tl4tkuKHOv8wFa0wMoiWdSEHx8co8RYDDOFhDtTGisL9noJTe0
+00jXnF+7GIQrxoBIhe0txRVs+Di1w2jj5pkK5jj7LQ8l/stMeqUhCcBYdNx/v1p
6QkuyLE/or1oDj4wI+pKtrih4rFkSDzygB55SIHKM1m6+QSeFd9517fKygu6xoTs
sgCDPp+C+nVp6bQtXUITCoqHmf7uhR/nJPK9wMDOwBSRwiEwiLCSjhGr1D2Ljlaf
O0zObs2KhhMAYPk8++7I818TOpHz1WrFPVjjLFfp8gOZK+7ytpn1eQ==
=tH8D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
