On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:48:52AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:56:51AM -0800, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > And is the overwhelming majority of interactive scripts that _do_ use > > debconf already not a huge enough amount? > No, it's not "current practice" to use debconf when a bunch of important > packages specifically don't use it. Which ones? The only one I can think of is LILO which appeared to have less to do with debconf than with the maintainer getting flamed to death for trashing everyone's configuration. -- "You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
pgpHSIprAJHgK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
