Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote:
>> A scheme that would always satisfy this would be to use +<letter><version> >> for stable/security updates where <version> is the Debian version being >> targeted similar to how that's done for backports (so 50 for lenny or 60 >> for squeeze), and <letter> is some letter between b and n. (Alternately, >> we could use a different convention for NMUs than +nmu, but that's so >> self-explanatory that it would be nice to stick with it.) > Interesting. +d60 for "Debian 6.0". :) > What happens when there are more than 10 updates for a single Debian > version? Maybe that's not worth worrying about --- such a package is > either horribly buggy or should be using a more sensible versioning > scheme (e.g., ia32-libs and clamav-data just use the date). Oh, sorry, you'd actually use +d60+1 (and then +d60+2, etc.) like you do for backports. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
