Roger Leigh <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 05:09:34PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Interesting. +d60 for "Debian 6.0". :) >> What happens when there are more than 10 updates for a single Debian >> version? Maybe that's not worth worrying about --- such a package is >> either horribly buggy or should be using a more sensible versioning >> scheme (e.g., ia32-libs and clamav-data just use the date). > Given that this is part of a version number, why aren't we just using > +d6.0 and letting dpkg handle it? Because the period will make various programs think that it's an NMU, so it's not as backwards compatible. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
