debian-project  

Messages by Date

• 2000/11/29 Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included Christian Surchi
• 2000/11/29 Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included Brian Mays
• 2000/11/29 Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included Brian Frederick Kimball
• 2000/11/29 Re: [PROPOSAL] Full text of GPL must be included Brian Mays
• 2000/11/26 Re: Bug#69197: inadequate backup instructions kmself
• 2000/11/25 Re: Bug#69197: inadequate backup instructions Josip Rodin
• 2000/11/24 Re: Bug#69197: inadequate backup instructions Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2000/11/24 Re: Bug#69197: inadequate backup instructions Aaron Lehmann
• 2000/11/24 Re: Bug#69197: inadequate backup instructions Josip Rodin
• 2000/11/23 Re: Debian joins Gnome Foundation Advisory Board Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/11/23 Re: Debian joins Gnome Foundation Advisory Board Martin Schulze
• 2000/11/23 Re: Debian joins Gnome Foundation Advisory Board Colin Watson
• 2000/11/13 Re: Web site his future James A. Treacy
• 2000/11/09 Re: Web site his future Bas Zoetekouw
• 2000/11/08 Re: Web site his future Craig Small
• 2000/11/07 Re: Web site his future Christian Surchi
• 2000/11/06 Re: Web site his future Martin Michlmayr
• 2000/11/06 Web site his future Christian Surchi
• 2000/10/31 Re: Request for comments: use of project funds for hardware Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/10/31 Re: Request for comments: use of project funds for hardware David N. Welton
• 2000/10/31 Re: Request for comments: use of project funds for hardware Steve Greenland
• 2000/10/30 Re: Request for comments: use of project funds for hardware Jason Gunthorpe
• 2000/10/30 Re: Request for comments: use of project funds for hardware Anthony Towns
• 2000/10/30 Request for comments: use of project funds for hardware Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/10/10 Re: [BALLOT] Social Contract Change Amendment David N. Welton
• 2000/10/02 Re: RFC: Constitution overhaul Kai Henningsen
• 2000/09/30 Is (telephone) contact information necessary? Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/09/29 new email address Glenn McGrath
• 2000/09/29 RFC: Constitution overhaul Chris Lawrence
• 2000/09/29 AM report Agustín Martín Domingo Drake Diedrich
• 2000/09/29 AM Report for Anton Gyllenberg Guillaume Morin
• 2000/09/29 AM report for Atsuhito Kohda Bas Zoetekouw
• 2000/09/28 Re: DMUP Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/09/28 Re: your mail Dale Scheetz
• 2000/09/28 Problem application Dale Scheetz
• 2000/09/28 Re: please reassign my charges (again) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/09/27 Re: please reassign my charges (again) Gerfried Fuchs
• 2000/09/27 Re: Arthur Korn on hold Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/09/27 Re: netscape crashes on applicants' status pages Ralf Treinen
• 2000/09/27 Arthur Korn on hold Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/09/27 Re: netscape crashes on applicants' status pages Drake Diedrich
• 2000/09/27 Re: netscape crashes on applicants' status pages Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/09/27 netscape crashes on applicants' status pages Ralf Treinen
• 2000/09/27 [no subject] Ralf Treinen
• 2000/09/27 AM report for Jerome Marant Davide Puricelli
• 2000/09/27 please reassign my charges (again) Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2000/09/27 Re: NM process reasons Dale Scheetz
• 2000/09/27 NM process reasons Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/27 Re: Final report for Andreas Mueller Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/27 DMUP Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/27 AM report for Martin Michlmayr Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/26 Re: Good news week... Clay Crouch
• 2000/09/26 Final report for Andreas Mueller Dale Scheetz
• 2000/09/26 Good news week... Dale Scheetz
• 2000/09/26 Christophe Rhodes on hold Matthew Vernon
• 2000/09/25 Angus Lees on hold Craig Small
• 2000/09/25 Eliot Landrum on hold Craig Small
• 2000/09/25 Final Report on Dave Baker Clay Crouch
• 2000/09/25 AM report for Ola Lundqvist H. S. Teoh
• 2000/09/25 AM Report on Paul van Tilburg Fumitoshi UKAI
• 2000/09/25 Re: recommends approval of "Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer" Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/24 Re: recommends approval of "Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer" Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/09/24 recommends approval of Benoit Joly Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/24 recommends approval of "Jorgen 'forcer' Schaefer" Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/23 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/23 AM Final Report on Shane Wegner Clay Crouch
• 2000/09/22 AM Report on Pete Lypkie Mike Mattice
• 2000/09/22 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/22 AM report: Yves Arrouye Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/22 Re: AM Report on Santiago Garcia Mantinan Christian Surchi
• 2000/09/22 Re: AM Report on Santiago Garcia Mantinan Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/09/22 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Christian Surchi
• 2000/09/21 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Gerfried Fuchs
• 2000/09/21 Re: AM Report on Santiago Garcia Mantinan Craig Small
• 2000/09/21 AM Report on Santiago Garcia Mantinan Mike Mattice
• 2000/09/21 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/21 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Christian Surchi
• 2000/09/20 Re: How long to wait for applicant response? Craig Small
• 2000/09/20 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/20 Re: How long to wait for applicant response? Dale Scheetz
• 2000/09/20 Re: AM report for Marek Habersack Mark Brown
• 2000/09/20 How long to wait for applicant response? Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/09/19 Re: AM report for Marek Habersack Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/19 New version of AM-HOWTO Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/19 Re: Where to send NM reports? Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/19 gnupg 1.0.1 <-> gnupg 1.0.2 problem? (Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter) Fumitoshi UKAI
• 2000/09/19 AM report for Marek Habersack H. S. Teoh
• 2000/09/19 AM Report for Adrian Bunk tony mancill
• 2000/09/19 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
• 2000/09/19 Re: A problem with identification Christian Surchi
• 2000/09/19 Re: Agreeing with philosophies/procedures Craig Small
• 2000/09/19 Re: Translation skills Craig Small
• 2000/09/19 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Craig Small
• 2000/09/19 Re: Where to send NM reports? Craig Small
• 2000/09/19 Re: A problem with identification Craig Small
• 2000/09/18 Re: A problem with identification Christian Surchi
• 2000/09/18 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/09/17 Re: A problem with identification Christian Surchi
• 2000/09/17 RE: A problem with identification Jim Westveer
• 2000/09/17 Re: A problem with identification Shane Wegner
• 2000/09/17 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/17 A problem with identification Christian Surchi
• 2000/09/17 Re: key signing coordination page [[email protected]: Re: becomming a debian developer (fwd)] Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/17 Re: AM Mini-HOWTO Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/17 Re: The Debian New Maintainer process Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/17 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Mike Mattice
• 2000/09/17 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
• 2000/09/17 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
• 2000/09/17 packaging suggestions for applicant michael d. ivey
• 2000/09/17 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
• 2000/09/17 Re: Update on "New Maintainers Corner" web page Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/16 Re: Where to send NM reports? Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/16 [[email protected]: Re: becomming a debian developer (fwd)] Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/16 Re: Query on requirements for identification Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/16 Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/16 RE: Where to send NM reports? Jim Westveer
• 2000/09/16 Where to send NM reports? Clay Crouch
• 2000/09/15 RE: Query on requirements for identification Jim Westveer
• 2000/09/15 AM Report on Chris Rutter Fumitoshi UKAI
• 2000/09/15 Query on requirements for identification John O Sullivan
• 2000/09/15 Re: gpg key question (first applicant) Guillaume Morin
• 2000/09/15 Re: gpg key question (first applicant) Bolan Meek
• 2000/09/15 Translation skills H. S. Teoh
• 2000/09/15 Agreeing with philosophies/procedures H. S. Teoh
• 2000/09/15 gpg key question (first applicant) Guillaume Morin
• 2000/09/14 NM website changes Craig Small
• 2000/09/14 New developers -> new AMs Julian Gilbey
• 2000/09/06 Re: ITP enhydra John Leuner
• 2000/09/06 Re: Woody ISOs Santiago Garcia Mantinan
• 2000/09/06 Re: nm-admin/[email protected] superseded Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/09/05 Re: ITP enhydra Stephane Bortzmeyer
• 2000/09/05 Re: ITP enhydra John Leuner
• 2000/09/05 Re: ITP enhydra Stephane Bortzmeyer
• 2000/09/05 Re: Woody ISOs Remco van de Meent
• 2000/09/04 Woody ISOs Kyle Lynch
• 2000/09/04 nm-admin/[email protected] superseded Lars Steinke
• 2000/09/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Andreas Rottmann
• 2000/08/31 Re: Identification step in the current scheme C.M. Connelly
• 2000/08/28 Re: Bug#70121: automatic build fails for potato Colin Watson
• 2000/08/28 Bug#70121: automatic build fails for potato Dirk Eddelbuettel
• 2000/08/23 Re: Potato cd cover art ? Martin Schulze
• 2000/08/23 Potato cd cover art ? Philippe Troin
• 2000/08/19 Debian presentation to GOLUM Chris Lawrence
• 2000/08/17 Re: vger.rutgers.edu & lmkl down ? Remco van de Meent
• 2000/08/16 vger.rutgers.edu & lmkl down ? Philippe Troin
• 2000/08/14 Re: [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? clemensF
• 2000/08/14 Re: [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/14 Re: [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? goswin . brederlow
• 2000/08/14 [nm-admin] Need for scanner to become a maintainer? Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/13 Re: Need for scanner to become a maintainer? Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/12 Re: It spreads by casual contact... goswin . brederlow
• 2000/08/12 Need for scanner to become a maintainer? goswin . brederlow
• 2000/08/11 It spreads by casual contact... Seth Cohn
• 2000/08/08 Re: ALS (October 10-14) Martin Schulze
• 2000/08/08 ALS (October 10-14) Chris Lawrence
• 2000/08/06 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Chris Pimlott
• 2000/08/06 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Branden Robinson
• 2000/08/06 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
• 2000/08/06 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
• 2000/08/05 Oops: _not_ a debian derived system - NIC (www.thinknic.com) Seth Cohn
• 2000/08/05 Note on photo-ID (Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme Seth Cohn
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Chris Pimlott
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Detlev Zundel
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Oliver M . Bolzer
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Jim Ziegler
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Jim Ziegler
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Jim Ziegler
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Jim Ziegler
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Jim Ziegler
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Branden Robinson
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/04 Another debian derived system - NIC (www.thinknic.com) Seth Cohn
• 2000/08/04 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Shane Wegner
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Clay Crouch
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anthony Towns
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Jim Westveer
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Peter Palfrader
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/03 Scanned Photos Req'd (was Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current... scheme ) Bolan Meek
• 2000/08/03 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anthony Towns
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard=22?=
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Detlev Zundel
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Detlev Zundel
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fearthe new maintainer process) Chris Pimlott

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]