debian-project  

Messages by Date

• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Debian JP applicants Fumitoshi UKAI
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Richard Braakman
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/02 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Matthew Vernon
• 2000/08/02 Debian JP applicants Drake Diedrich
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anthony Towns
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
• 2000/08/01 Photo ID (was Re: [nm-admin] Identification step ...) Bolan Meek
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) William Ono
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Oliver Elphick
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Nils Lohner
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Nils Lohner
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Nils Lohner
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Gopal Narayanan
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Steve Greenland
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) An Thi-Nguyen Le
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
• 2000/08/01 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/07/31 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Joey Hess
• 2000/07/31 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Joey Hess
• 2000/07/31 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_M=FCller?=
• 2000/07/31 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Anand Kumria
• 2000/07/31 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Mark Brown
• 2000/07/31 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/07/31 Gibraltar project: first pre-release Rene Mayrhofer
• 2000/07/31 RE: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Matthew Vernon
• 2000/07/30 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Jim Westveer
• 2000/07/30 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Peter Palfrader
• 2000/07/30 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/07/30 Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Anand Kumria
• 2000/07/30 RE: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe Jim Westveer
• 2000/07/30 Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/30 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
• 2000/07/30 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Stephen R. Gore
• 2000/07/30 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/07/30 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/07/30 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Christian Surchi
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Stephane Bortzmeyer
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Anand Kumria
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Clint Adams
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/26 Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Brian Mays
• 2000/07/26 Re: Please reply soon, or I could not proceed (Re: how to be arude bastard?) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/26 Re: Thanks for your information (Re: Please reply soon, or I could notproceed) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/26 Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Brian Mays
• 2000/07/26 Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Chris Lawrence
• 2000/07/26 Re: An amendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2000/07/26 Re: Please reply soon, or I could not proceed (Re: how to be a rude bastard?) Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Jason Gunthorpe
• 2000/07/26 Priority for Sponsored (was Re: Fear the new maintainer process) Bolan Meek
• 2000/07/26 Mind the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Brian Mays
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Thomas Bushnell, BSG
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Dirk Eddelbuettel
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process J�r�me Marant
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Ben Collins
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Jason Gunthorpe
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Mark Brown
• 2000/07/26 Re: Fear the new maintainer process Joop Stakenborg
• 2000/07/26 Re: Req Fer Code: Mirrors list checker tool Dirk Eddelbuettel
• 2000/07/26 Fear the new maintainer process Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/25 Thanks for your information (Re: Please reply soon, or I could notproceed) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/25 Re: Req Fer Code: Mirrors list checker tool Fabien Ninoles
• 2000/07/25 Req Fer Code: Mirrors list checker tool Jason Gunthorpe
• 2000/07/25 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Craig Sanders
• 2000/07/25 Please reply soon, or I could not proceed (Re: how to be a rudebastard?) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Anthony Towns
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Dirk Eddelbuettel
• 2000/07/19 Re: Proposed amendment to Manoj's proposal John Goerzen
• 2000/07/19 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Herbert Xu
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Jordi Mallach
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marek Habersack
• 2000/07/19 Re: Proposed amendment to Manoj's proposal Peter Crystal
• 2000/07/19 Re: Proposed amendment to Manoj's proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/07/19 Proposed amendment to Manoj's proposal Robert D. Hilliard
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/19 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Manoj Srivastava
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Steve Greenland
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/07/19 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/07/19 Re: Proposed amendment to Manoj's proposal Edward C. Lang
• 2000/07/19 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Jules Bean
• 2000/07/19 Proposed amendment to Manoj's proposal Branden Robinson
• 2000/07/19 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Branden Robinson
• 2000/07/19 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Branden Robinson
• 2000/07/19 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Brian F. Kimball
• 2000/07/18 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Manoj Srivastava
• 2000/07/17 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Steve Greenland
• 2000/07/17 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchive removal) Manoj Srivastava
• 2000/07/17 Foundational Document Protection (was Re: Constit...uti [was Re:CFV...]) Bolan Meek
• 2000/07/17 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: on-freearchiveremoval) Clay Crouch
• 2000/07/17 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Jules Bean
• 2000/07/14 Re: Please don't remove libc5 - old non-free software might need it! David Starner
• 2000/07/14 Re: Please don't remove libc5 - old non-free software might need it! David Starner
• 2000/07/14 Re: Please don't remove libc5 - old non-free software might need it! Bolan Meek
• 2000/07/14 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Michael Bramer
• 2000/07/13 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) William Ono
• 2000/07/12 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Manoj Srivastava
• 2000/07/12 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Craig Sanders
• 2000/07/10 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/09 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Julian Gilbey
• 2000/07/09 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Manoj Srivastava
• 2000/07/08 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Craig Sanders
• 2000/07/08 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Bolan Meek
• 2000/07/08 Re: Why we need Debian (ZDNet) Martin Schulze
• 2000/07/08 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Craig Sanders
• 2000/07/08 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Anthony Towns
• 2000/07/07 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchive removal) Craig Sanders
• 2000/07/07 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-freearchiveremoval) Bolan Meek
• 2000/07/07 Re: Idea: Debian Release Sections Joey Hess
• 2000/07/07 Re: Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal) Craig Sanders
• 2000/07/07 Re: Idea: Debian Release Sections Chris Pimlott
• 2000/07/06 Constitutional, Parliamentary Issues (was Re: CFV: Non-free archiveremoval) Bolan Meek
• 2000/07/06 Re: pgp and gpg David N. Welton
• 2000/07/06 Re: request for a init script policy Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2000/07/06 Re: pgp and gpg David N. Welton
• 2000/07/05 Idea: Debian Release Sections Paul J Thompson
• 2000/07/05 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/07/05 Re: request for a init script policy Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/07/03 Re: Linux Magazine award Craig Small
• 2000/07/03 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/03 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal David N. Welton
• 2000/07/02 Linux Magazine award Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/07/02 Re: request for a init script policy Chris Lawrence
• 2000/07/02 Re: request for a init script policy Henrique M Holschuh
• 2000/07/02 Re: request for a init script policy Daniel Burrows
• 2000/07/02 Re: request for a init script policy Jon Nelson
• 2000/07/02 Re: On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/07/02 On the lets-remove-nonfree-proposal Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/07/02 Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free Taketoshi Sano
• 2000/07/02 Re: Interoperability among .deb implementations Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/07/02 Re: How much support for Debian/Win32 and Debian/Nonfreeos? Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/07/01 RE: How much support for Debian/Win32 and Debian/Nonfreeos? Mike Huddleson
• 2000/07/01 Re: Debian Weekly News - June 27th, 2000 Miguel Wooding SF Ten.Union
• 2000/07/01 Re: Debian Critical Mass David N. Welton
• 2000/06/30 Re: request for a init script policy Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo
• 2000/06/30 request for a init script policy Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
• 2000/06/28 Re: pgp and gpg Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/06/28 pgp and gpg David N. Welton
• 2000/06/27 Re: ITPers should have Sponsors David N. Welton
• 2000/06/27 Re: How much support for Debian/Win32 and Debian/Nonfreeos? Radovan Garabik
• 2000/06/27 How much support for Debian/Win32 and Debian/Nonfreeos? Max Berger
• 2000/06/26 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/06/24 Re: Linux tag Nils Lohner
• 2000/06/24 Re: Linux tag Martin Schulze
• 2000/06/24 Re: Linux tag Nils Lohner
• 2000/06/23 Re: Linux tag Martin Schulze
• 2000/06/23 Re: Linux tag Roland Bauerschmidt
• 2000/06/23 Linux tag David N. Welton
• 2000/06/22 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/06/21 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Craig Sanders
• 2000/06/19 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Dale Scheetz
• 2000/06/18 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Steve Greenland
• 2000/06/17 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Marcus Brinkmann
• 2000/06/17 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/06/17 Re: An ammendment (Re: Formal CFV: General Resolution to Abolish Non-Free) Dale Scheetz

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]