Hi all, On 19.02.20 06:54, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > gregor herrmann dijo [Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 09:00:33PM +0100]: >>> That's good, the desire to have it public does not equate to a desire or >>> need for me to be there. IMO it's just important that this doesn't >>> happen behind closed doors again like last time. >> >> AFAICS the process for DC20 and DC21 seems to be the same: >> - public review meetings for the bids >> - a private decision meeting of the committee >> >> I'd be happy to learn that my impression about the planned procedure >> for the DC21 decision is wrong, I might easily have missed something. >> >> Personally I much prefer public decisions. > > FWIW, we are still pending to come to a conclusion regarding > DC21. This has been a tough process, and we will soon come to a > conclusion. Yes, I have been part of several prior DebConf > bid-choosing teams, and yes, sometimes the decisions are easier to get > to. Private (side-channel?) communication between committee/choosing > team members _always_ happens, but we have always tried to make the > reasoning available to the Debian community; this time it will not be > different.
Is the decision making process clearly documented somewhere? Is the decision making body documented somewhere, i.e. ewhere can I find out who is part of the committee? And how can people join this body? ulrike
