On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:47:06PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Michael Hanke, 2009-01-25] > > To me the question is: Why is sphinx 0.5 in experimental not unstable? > > This issue does not only affect numpy, as sphinx 0.4.3 has some problems > > which prevent successful building of docs (e.g. image/figure handling > > bug) -- and at least this one is solved in 0.5. > > if you will help me convince release managers to unblock it, I will > upload 0.5 to unstable (if Mikhail will not protest).
I cannot think of any argument in favor of sphinx transitioning from unstable/experimental to testing. At the same time, I have a hard time seeing the need for a full blown unstable>testing transition for a package that aims to become part of lenny (i.e. preventing a direct upload to testing-proposed-updates). I'd be curious to know which/how many packages in lenny actually build-depend on sphinx. Does anyone know a way to quickly determine that -- it might provide some facts about the situation we are speculating about. Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke ICQ: 48230050 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org