On Aug 07, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: >To avoid quilt(1), I use "gbp pq" instead. What I commit to git as a >result interoperates with quilt(1), in the sense that someone like >Sandro could clone one of my repositories, manipulate the patch queue >with quilt(1), and not have to know or care that I used gbp pq; and I >could work with one of Sandro's repositories with gbp pq, without having >to deal with quilt. That seems like a nice property to have.
I really wish git-pq and git-dpm could interoperate, then it really wouldn't matter which the patch management tool was chosen. Unfortunately, unless things have changed in the last year, I don't think that's the case. Cheers, -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150807104421.016c3...@limelight.wooz.org
