On Oct 07 2015, Piotr Ożarowski <pi...@debian.org> wrote:
> I no longer think requiring contribution (the 3 months thing) is a good
> idea for DPMT (might be for a new team).
>
> I assume you all like other ideas, like no team in Maintainer, right?
>
> * team only in Uploaders field, the main contact (AKA Maintainer) has to
>   be real person (reason: nobody reads -team mailing list) + automatic
>   team subscription via script that sets up git repository
> * emails with all commits (diffs) made by someone not listed in Maintainer
>   are automatically sent to Maintainer

Sounds good to me.

> * when someone who is not listed in debian/control (i.e.
>   Maintainer/Uploaders) wants to upload team package - just commit
>   and upload to DELAYED/2 (in case of RC bug) or to DELAYED/7, no need
>   to notify anyone, because...

No opinion, I'd need a sponsor anyway.


> * removal¹ of packages (not person) from the team if there's no
>   contribution in 3 months in a row (and given person is not MIA, as in
>   active in other packages, for MIA ones: decide if someone wants to
>   take over or orphan the package, no more team packages that nobody
>   takes care of and no objections if someone takes over your package)
>
> [¹] as in upload to unstable without DPMT in Uploaders, repo stays in
>     case one decides come back

Not sure about that one. What would be gained by this? What if the
package is simply in good shape and doesn't need contributions?


Best,
-Nikolaus

-- 
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

Reply via email to