-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-10-21 15:54, Barry Warsaw wrote: > Hopefully, the latest changes (see previous follow up) are both > more concise and coherent.
maybe. i have to admit i'm not totally used to an reviewing git patches per mailinglists, and in this case i got lost a little bit what the current draft is. would it be possible to put a complete draft online somewhere (maybe even as an r/o git), in addition to posting the patches on the ml. fg,asdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWKKtpAAoJELZQGcR/ejb4IAoP/iawsZNZApH4TsalsLOUe2I5 HVO9N0/KpmiJZtHWLdj0kfzbdiffb7GCcpDggZgzX3sZiWzQgMJAprqi8zX66hqR txIIPMDehm/QrxS7Gc1Ul6X/hpiaB/j4ROHjzzHoWrNsyXPaOCrOJ/I6nEwCh5Qb BGnHkYbIYd1yqJzkPVcGRedwrWcsjOh4AiodxQMk8TDxnz/dcjc2BBQqx0cyCAIX GW4P3RE0Tzf/K0327eQgA3hUTZnCB4IBHl1Z4Fo6Eb24MjuU0eE2LY1nOFXOwqYX hwTNZ40X/yBjj9YI3rBNYb7Z+PThKWnP4dBHtaBUNfVeb0X+8MOlmB03RW5oVKA4 DmOCOEBWngCTcybXV7xsmyXkfa8ZxK/WE98nfNhVX2kVc5O3DAiiTAwpKTTqzLL4 3wUtbT/F7cPmju6GwyU3BVt/edazpzd6ovGJc7KVdqaDJ5YNvf1KPQNcO0PevMwF wArJD7JH3+qdd5dpTaZYJY+Ej1SBDkKT0BYtJa2H5EsU7OVZ+XBh39lqmtzUWPIY On1NfhmfuMQ1Zl0P1woOVvXtFv8AJQEY2uVmNzP50dyKq+4qLmFNNmocWEf3QI2I emp16RgczBi6eiJbu+1xnGlhv3ygi4coH/QiWzgIvtjp3PmvTXBZThtrXdwQ3QMa PX8qDp/tQqEk/MNMRpSl =u0vU -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
