Scott Kitterman <sc...@kitterman.com> writes: > Personally, I don't know enough to have an opinion. I'm interested in the > views of DPMT members with gbp pq experience. What's the consensus about > branch naming (all I know is for git-dpm, it was pretty hard wired)?
I tend to think that branching will easier with git pq. I seem to remember some maintainers having problems with non-standard branch names under git dpm. So one valid reason for not adopting different branches will no longer apply. I personally think that DEP14 would be a good idea. I think the only difference people would notice is that master is renamed to debian/master. We would need to be careful though, having both a master and a debian/master - even during transition planning - could be confusing. Which one do I update? Probably no way to mark a branch read only on alioth either (?). After the transition, what happens to the master branch? Do we delete it? -- Brian May <b...@debian.org>
