Hi Thanks for the update. I had problems sending the email.
El 7/5/20 a las 12:55 PM, Geert Stappers escribió: > Control: retitle -1 RFP: python-language-server -- Python implementation of > the Language Server Protocol > Control: owner -1 Pablo Mestre <pmdc...@gmail.com> > Control: subscribe -1 > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2020 at 09:29:36AM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 12:48 AM Pablo Mestre <pmdc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> El 7/1/20 a las 10:58 PM, Nicholas D Steeves escribió: >>>> Awesome, thank you :-) I expect it will be a popular package too! >>> [.....] >>>> If you're committed to packaging python lsp, then set yourself as the >>>> owner of #96360, and retitle it, replacing "RFP" with "ITP". >>> Yes, I committed to packaging >>>> If the absence of a python-jsonrpc-server package is a blocker for >>>> #963605, and you want to work on it, then file an ITP for >>>> python-jsonrpc-server, set yourself as owner, and also set up a blocks >>>> relationship between the two bugs. >>> You mean >>> >>> Control: block 946035 by -1 >>> Control: block #[newcode] by -1 >>> >>> Something like this? >>> >> yes go ahead. >> >> I don't see the ITP for python-jsonrpc-server. Do you need some help? >> > I felt the need to show how to do it. > > > >>>> Tools for doing this more conveniently are "bts" from devscripts, and >>>> "reportbug" for filing the ITP. IIRC bts requires an MTA (mail >>>> transport agent) and for this I'd recommend msmtp-mta, because most >>>> people find it easier to configure authentication with it than with >>>> Postfix, Exim, etc. >>>> >>>> If you'd like to do it manually for now, see: >>>> https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control >>> Ok >>> >>> Thanks for all >>> >>> P. >>> > @Pablo > > My intension is to help. > I'm aware you didn't asked for the BTS update I did. > > Do know that the Bug Tracking System information on #963605 > can be easily updated again. > > > Regards > Geert Stappers