Hi Thomas, On 31/10/23 at 13:08 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not really sure what's going on, but I saw many packages marked as RC > buggy with Sphinx 7.1, docutils 0.20, however, both are still in > Experimental, not in Unstable. I tried rebuilding those, and in built fine. > I therefore closed the bugs. > > I'm not sure if I was right doing so, and what's the intention behind > bumping severity to serious. Is this for preparing before the upload of > sphinx+docutils to unstable? If so, I would strongly suggest explaining this > in bug entries, stating the intention is to upload sphinx and docutils very > soon. Otherwise, like me, someone may wrongly close the bugs after a > successful rebuild.
See this message: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042585;msg=7 and this comment from Dmitry Shachnev: # Dear Maintainers, I am going to upload Sphinx 7.2.6 to unstable next weekend. # That will make these packages FTBFS in sid, which is a release-critical bug. # The new docutils will be uploaded after Sphinx migrates to testing. Lucas
