debian-release  

Messages by Date

• 2000/05/15 Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/15 Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/15 Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Josip Rodin
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/15 Re: potato section on security.debian.org Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/05/15 Re: potato section on security.debian.org Jason Gunthorpe
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Raphael Hertzog
• 2000/05/15 RE: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works wo uld invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Andrew Weiss
• 2000/05/15 potato section on security.debian.org Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/05/15 Re: [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/15 Up and running with a fully working X configuration? Karl M. Hegbloom
• 2000/05/15 [dark: READ!] CD images / Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/14 Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Karl M. Hegbloom
• 2000/05/14 Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Mike Bilow
• 2000/05/14 Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Jim Lynch
• 2000/05/14 Re: Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Josip Rodin
• 2000/05/14 Formal objection: Changing how the testing of potato works would invalidate the whole test. So please don't change it. Jim Lynch
• 2000/05/13 Re: First Test Cycle starts today Josip Rodin
• 2000/05/09 More installs to frozen Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/08 Re: 2.2.13 okay for first cycle? (was Re: Packages installed today) Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/05/08 IMPORTANT - powerpc broken Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/05/08 Packages installed today Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/07 Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled Adrian Bunk
• 2000/05/06 Contents for potato/main/upgrade-i386 J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/05 Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/05 Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html David Huggins-Daines
• 2000/05/05 Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/05 Re: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/63/63485.html Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/04 Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled Hamish Moffatt
• 2000/05/03 Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/05/03 potato release status -- boot-floppies 2.2.13 Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/05/03 [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled Adrian Bunk
• 2000/05/03 Re: More packages installed today Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/05/03 More packages installed today Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/03 Re: kernels in potato destabilized Brian Mays
• 2000/05/03 Re: kernels in potato destabilized Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/03 Installed 2 packages Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/02 Re: critical potato archive inconsistency Brian Mays
• 2000/05/02 Re: CONFIRMED: Boot NOT floppies okay (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Ben Collins
• 2000/05/02 critical potato archive inconsistency Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/05/02 CONFIRMED: Boot NOT floppies okay (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/05/02 Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Nils Rennebarth
• 2000/05/02 Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/05/02 Re: Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) Richard Braakman
• 2000/05/02 Boot floppies okay? (was Re: First Test Cycle starts today) J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/04/29 kernels in potato destabilized Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/29 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Adrian Bunk
• 2000/04/28 wrong priorities in default packages Santiago Vila
• 2000/04/27 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Raphael Hertzog
• 2000/04/27 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Santiago Vila
• 2000/04/27 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/27 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Adrian Bunk
• 2000/04/26 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/26 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/26 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Santiago Vila
• 2000/04/26 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/25 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Daniel Barclay
• 2000/04/25 2.1r6 & Re: Uploaded imap 4.5-0slink3 (source i386) to master J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/04/25 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/25 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Yann Dirson
• 2000/04/24 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Josip Rodin
• 2000/04/24 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Santiago Vila
• 2000/04/24 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/04/24 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Santiago Vila
• 2000/04/24 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Pleaserelease 2.1r6) Adrian Bunk
• 2000/04/24 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Joel Klecker
• 2000/04/23 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/23 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/23 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Jim Westveer
• 2000/04/23 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Raphael Hertzog
• 2000/04/23 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Ben Collins
• 2000/04/23 Re: potato kernels and debian-cd Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/23 potato kernels and debian-cd Jim Westveer
• 2000/04/22 Re: file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Please release 2.1r6) Adrian Bunk
• 2000/04/22 file RC bugs for potato uninstallable pkgs (was Re: Please release 2.1r6) Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/22 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/04/21 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Raphael Hertzog
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Philip Charles
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Anthony Towns
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Ben Collins
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Jim Lynch
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Ben Collins
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Philip Charles
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Philip Charles
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Ben Collins
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Christian Meder
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Ben Collins
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Herbert Xu
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Santiago Vila
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Martin Schulze
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Martin Schulze
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Daniel Jacobowitz
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Ben Collins
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Jim Westveer
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Martin Schulze
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Jim Lynch
• 2000/04/20 kernel we release with (was Re: Preparing for first test cycle) Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Jim Westveer
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/04/20 RE: Preparing for first test cycle Brandon Mitchell
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Please release 2.1r6 Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/20 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Richard Braakman
• 2000/04/19 Re: Fwd/Re: Preparing for first test cycle Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/19 Re: Preparing for first test cycle Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/19 Re: Please release 2.1r6 J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/04/14 Re: 2.1r6 on the way... Christian Meder
• 2000/04/14 2.2.11 release plans Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/04/11 Re: Bug#62167: install over serial-console fails on alpha David Huggins-Daines
• 2000/04/11 2.1r6 on the way... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/04/11 ftp.debian.org 2.1r5/6 issues: w3-el, security and ChangeLog J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/03/30 Re: boot-floppies 2.2.9 in Incoming Ben Collins
• 2000/03/30 Re: boot-floppies 2.2.9 in Incoming Richard Braakman
• 2000/03/29 Re: boot-floppies 2.2.9 in Incoming Ben Collins
• 2000/03/29 boot-floppies 2.2.9 in Incoming Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/03/26 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Philip Charles
• 2000/03/26 Re: Debian 2.1r5 paulwade
• 2000/03/26 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Philip Charles
• 2000/03/25 Re: Debian 2.1r5 paulwade
• 2000/03/24 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Christian Surchi
• 2000/03/24 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Mark Brown
• 2000/03/23 2.1r5 boot-floppies ? Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Christian Surchi
• 2000/03/23 Re: Bug#60956: ARM is not supported (patch included) Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Mark Brown
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Jordi
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Jim Westveer
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Jim Westveer
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Christian Surchi
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Vincent Renardias
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Christian Surchi
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Jordi
• 2000/03/23 Re: Debian 2.1r5 Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/03/23 Debian 2.1r5 Jordi
• 2000/03/16 Re: 2.1r5 Jim Westveer
• 2000/03/16 Re: 2.1r5 Philip Charles
• 2000/03/16 Re: 2.1r5 J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/03/12 RE: 2.1r5 Master file J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/03/07 Re: 2.1r5 Master file J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/03/03 Re: 2.1r5 Michael Schmitz
• 2000/03/03 Re: 2.1r5 Vincent Renardias
• 2000/03/02 2.1r5 James Troup
• 2000/03/01 Re: 2.1r5... Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/03/01 2.1r5... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/28 Re: Need for Debian 2.1 r5 J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/02/28 Re: Need for Debian 2.1 r5 Gergely Madarasz
• 2000/02/28 Re: Need for Debian 2.1 r5 Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/28 Need for Debian 2.1 r5 Santiago Vila
• 2000/02/20 Re: Grave concerns on releasing alpha with the rest of potato Joel Klecker
• 2000/02/19 Re: Grave concerns on releasing alpha with the rest of potato Christopher C. Chimelis
• 2000/02/19 Re: Grave concerns on releasing alpha with the rest of potato David Huggins-Daines
• 2000/02/19 Re: Grave concerns on releasing alpha with the rest of potato Christopher C. Chimelis
• 2000/02/18 Grave concerns on releasing alpha with the rest of potato David Huggins-Daines
• 2000/02/17 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/02/16 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Ben Collins
• 2000/02/16 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Dave Love
• 2000/02/16 Re: 2.1r5 definitive list... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/16 Re: 2.1r5 definitive list... Steve McIntyre
• 2000/02/15 Re: 2.1r5 definitive list... J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/02/15 2.1r5 definitive list... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/14 HOT OPENINGS IN AUSTIN, TEXAS!!! jobs
• 2000/02/11 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Christian Meder
• 2000/02/09 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/09 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Roman Hodek
• 2000/02/09 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Roman Hodek
• 2000/02/09 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... J.A. Bezemer
• 2000/02/09 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Roman Hodek
• 2000/02/08 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Wichert Akkerman
• 2000/02/08 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/08 Re: update on 2.1r5 status... Christian Meder
• 2000/02/08 update on 2.1r5 status... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/06 Bug#57233: type1inst: Corel Linux includes higher upstream version; breaks upgrade Chris Lawrence
• 2000/02/04 Re: 2.1r5.... Christian Meder
• 2000/02/04 Re: 2.1r5.... Ben Collins
• 2000/02/04 2.1r5.... Vincent Renardias
• 2000/02/02 Re: Status of Potato? Richard Braakman
• 2000/01/31 Re: 2.2.14 changes committed Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/01/30 Re: Status of Potato? Adam Di Carlo
• 2000/01/30 Re: Definitive package list for 2.1r5... Christian Meder
• 2000/01/29 Re: Status of Potato? Adam Di Carlo

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]