On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:52:41PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > What is the ordering criteria on the buildds? > > According to the documentation: > > The packages are ordered by the following criteria (in > this order): > > - out-of-date/uncompiled (the former come first) > - priority (e.g. "required" before "optional") > - section (alphabetically) > - package name (alphabetically) [..] > Basicly, when there are no new/uncompiled packages involved, the > order is by priority, then section, then alphabetically.
That's useful to know, but doesn't seem to be correct in the arm case at least. 1. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all out-of-date. 2. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all priority low. 3. geda-gschem is section electronics. wipl is section net. speex is section sound. 4. geda-gschem < speex < wipl Yet wipl was uploaded yesterday and is #9, speex is #19, and geda-gschem is #36 (and slipping). What's the purpose of sorting by section in the ordering? I suppose the real problem is that there doesn't seem to be any progress on the queue. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
