Santiago Vila writes: > On Sat, 7 May 2005, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Santiago Vila writes: > > > Please note that build on mipsel for 0.14.1-11 FTBFS with the same error > > > as 0.14.4-2 in unstable: > > > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > > jikes-classpath: Depends: classpath but it is not going to be installed > > > > > > It seems there is something really messed up with the chroots. > > > Are testing-proposed-updates chroots really using sarge and not sid, > > > or it's just that the jikes-classpath brokenness has propagated to sarge? > > > In the latter case: Are the scripts that create testing not supposed > > > to ensure that every package in sarge may be installed? I'm puzzled. > > > > sorry, my mistake. libgcj-common currently is uninstallable. A new > > package should enter the archives tonight. > > So: How a package which may not be installed reached testing? > Does this breakage mean that the current checks made by the testing > scripts are not enough?
I didn't mention testing at all. Nothing is broken in testing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
