On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:21:53PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 14 May 2005 at 18:44, Steve Langasek wrote: > | > whereas my shlibs is unversioned, hence the mismatch/lack of entry for > | > RQuantLib:
> | > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libquantlib0.shlibs > | > libQuantLib 0 libquantlib0 > | > libQuantLibFunctions 0 libquantlib0 > | > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> > | > That warrants a new libquantlib0 release, doesn't it? > | Yes, it does. > New quantlib 0.3.9-2 packages (libquantlib0, libquantlib0-dev, > quantlib-example) are on their way now. > I will follow up with new versions of quantlib-ruby, quantlib-python and > r-cran-rquantlib by tomorrow to give the autobuilders a chance to prepare > 0.3.9-2 which these will depends upon. Doh. All four of these need to be reuploaded? I thought only r-cran-rquantlib was broken..? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
